Tesla vs Apple: which job is safer?
Layoff risk for Engineering roles in India, scored this morning from confirmed layoffs, WARN filings, earnings, hiring and news signals.
Tesla vs Apple, signal by signal
| Signal | Tesla | Apple |
|---|---|---|
| Layoff risk score | 33 / 100 | 40 / 100 |
| Risk band | MODERATE | MODERATE |
| 7-day move | 0 | -1 |
| 30-day move | +1 | -15 |
| Confirmed layoffs (1 yr) | 0 | 1 |
| Disclosed roles cut (1 yr) | 0 | 200 |
| WARN notices (7 d) | 0 | 18 |
| Layoff headlines (7 d) | 0 | 0 |
| Employee sentiment | stable | stable |
| Employee-reported layoffs (30 d) | 0 | 0 |
Green marks the safer side of each row. Lower is better on every risk signal except open roles and revenue growth, where more is the healthier reading.
90-day risk trend, side by side
Should you switch from Tesla to Apple?
Tesla scores 33/100 (moderate risk) against Apple's 40/100 (moderate) for Engineering roles in India — a 7-point gap. What sits behind the gap: Apple has confirmed 200 roles across 1 announcement in the past year against none at Tesla. Cutting the other way, Apple's risk fell 15 points over the last 30 days while Tesla's rose 1 point.
Direction matters as much as level. Over the last 30 days Tesla's risk score rose 1 point and Apple's fell 15 points. That is narrowing the gap, so the current verdict is the weaker of the two readings — check it again before you sign anything.
On confirmed events, Tesla has no confirmed layoff in the past year. Apple has 1 confirmed layoff totalling 200 disclosed roles on Aug 21. Confirmed cuts are the heaviest input to the score and they decay on a half-life rather than expiring, so a large recent round keeps weighing on a company for months while an old one fades gradually.
In the last seven days: Apple shed 1 point: its Aug 21 cut of 200 roles decaying out of the window, 54 days on; and 18 WARN notices filed with state labour departments this week.
Employee sentiment, blended from anonymous reports and the data signals, reads stable at Tesla and stable at Apple. Sentiment moves earlier than confirmed events but is far noisier, so treat it as a leading indicator rather than a score.
One caveat worth stating plainly: this compares employer-level risk, not your risk. Any engineering role on a revenue-critical team at the riskier company can be safer than a cost-centre role at the safer one. Read the score as the weather, not the forecast for your specific seat.