Cisco vs IBM: which job is safer?

Layoff risk for Engineering roles in India, scored this morning from confirmed layoffs, WARN filings, earnings, hiring and news signals.

Too close to call: Cisco and IBM carry the same layoff risk

Cisco scores 34/100 (moderate risk) against IBM's 34/100 (moderate) for Engineering roles in India — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a model built from public signals. Use the layoff record and the 30-day trend below to break the tie.

Cisco logo

Cisco

CSCO • Networking

34/ 100MODERATE
7-day move
-1
30-day move
-21
Safer than
30% of 89
Layoffs (1 yr)
1 · 4,000 roles
Employee mood: Stableread from public signals

Most recent confirmed cut: May 13, 2026, 4,000 roles.

Full Cisco report
IBM logo

IBM

IBM • Enterprise IT

34/ 100MODERATE
7-day move
no change
30-day move
+2
Safer than
30% of 89
Layoffs (1 yr)
None on record
Employee mood: Stableread from public signals

Most recent confirmed cut: Aug 26, 2024, 1,000 roles.

Full IBM report

Compare a different pair

Both companies are scored with the same model, on the same day, for the job family and region you pick.

Cisco vs IBM, signal by signal

Layoff risk signals for Cisco and IBM, updated Oct 13, 2026
SignalCiscoIBM
Layoff risk score34 / 10034 / 100
Risk bandMODERATEMODERATE
7-day move-10
30-day move-21+2
Confirmed layoffs (1 yr)10
Disclosed roles cut (1 yr)4,0000
WARN notices (7 d)00
Layoff headlines (7 d)00
Employee sentimentstablestable
Employee-reported layoffs (30 d)00

Green marks the safer side of each row. Lower is better on every risk signal except open roles and revenue growth, where more is the healthier reading.

90-day risk trend, side by side

Should you switch from Cisco to IBM?

Cisco scores 34/100 (moderate risk) against IBM's 34/100 (moderate) for Engineering roles in India — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a model built from public signals. Use the layoff record and the 30-day trend below to break the tie.

Direction matters as much as level. Over the last 30 days Cisco's risk score fell 21 points and IBM's rose 2 points. Neither is running away from the other, so the level reading is a real tie rather than a snapshot artefact — watch the trend alongside what employees are reporting.

On confirmed events, Cisco has 1 confirmed layoff totalling 4,000 disclosed roles on May 13. IBM has no confirmed layoff in the past year. Confirmed cuts are the heaviest input to the score and they decay on a half-life rather than expiring, so a large recent round keeps weighing on a company for months while an old one fades gradually.

In the last seven days: Cisco shed 1 point: its May 13 cut of 4,000 roles (5% of staff) decaying out of the window, 154 days on; and last quarter beat estimates by 4.4%.

Employee sentiment, blended from anonymous reports and the data signals, reads stable at Cisco and stable at IBM. Sentiment moves earlier than confirmed events but is far noisier, so treat it as a leading indicator rather than a score.

One caveat worth stating plainly: this compares employer-level risk, not your risk. Any engineering role on a revenue-critical team at the riskier company can be safer than a cost-centre role at the safer one. Read the score as the weather, not the forecast for your specific seat.

Cisco vs IBM — frequently asked questions

Is it safer to work at Cisco or IBM?

On today's data, neither. Cisco scores 34/100 (moderate risk) against IBM's 34/100 (moderate) for Engineering roles in India — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a model built from public signals. Use the layoff record and the 30-day trend below to break the tie.

Should I switch from Cisco to IBM?

Layoff risk should not decide it. At a 0-point gap the two are effectively level, so weigh pay, scope and how close the role sits to revenue — and use the 30-day trend above as the tiebreaker, since a company improving from a bad score often beats one deteriorating from a good one.

Which company has had more layoffs, Cisco or IBM?

At Cisco, PinkSlip has recorded 1 confirmed layoff totalling 4,000 disclosed roles on May 13. At IBM: no confirmed layoff in the past year. Only cuts that were publicly confirmed or filed as WARN notices are counted, and undisclosed headcounts are excluded from the totals — treat both numbers as a floor.

How does PinkSlip compare layoff risk between two companies?

Both companies are scored through exactly the same model on the same morning, for the same job family (Engineering) and region (India), so the two numbers are directly comparable. The score blends confirmed layoff events, state WARN filings, quarterly earnings and guidance, hiring and open-role trends, layoff news volume and anonymous crowd reports, each weighted by how predictive it has been and decayed on a half-life as it ages.